Poverty in India is deep rooted. The 200 years under British further intensified it.
After independence, several programs have been brought forward through Five-Year Plans in an attempt to alleviate poverty.
Dadabhai Naoroji was the first person who talked about the concept of Poverty Line
before independence.
Dadabhai Naoroji used ‘jail cost of living’ formula to calculate the poverty line.
The Task Force on Projections of Minimum Needs and Effective Consumption Demand constituted by the Planning Commission in 1979 also attempted to measure poverty.
Poverty is further categorized on parameters such as absolute poor, very poor and poor. Another categorization is based on parameters such as always poor, usually poor, chronic poor, churning poor, etc.
To demarcate the poverty line normally per capita calorie intake parameters is used, under which the minimum calorie intake (which is 2,400 calories/day for people in rural areas and 2,100/day for people in urban areas) is considered.
Many economists criticize the minimum calorie intake technique of measuring poverty because it does not solve many issues and also does not identify the real poor people.
To remove the drawbacks of this technique, many other techniques were invented; significant of them are −
Sen Index (by Nobel Laureate economist Amartya Sen),
Poverty Gap Index, and
Squared Poverty Gap.
Head Count Ratio is the number of poor as the proportion of people living below the poverty line.
In 1973-74, there were more than 320 million people below poverty line; the number has come down to 270 million in 2011-12. Likewise, more than three-fourth of the country’s poor people live in rural areas.
Many of the states in past three and four decades improved and the ratio of poverty declined; however, four states i.e. Odisha, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, and Uttar Pradesh still have poverty levels, less than the national poverty level.
The major causes of poverty in India are −
The farmers’ plight is worst in many parts of India. There is an increase in the number of farmers’ suicides especially in Maharashtra, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh.
There are many reasons that instigate the farmers to take this extreme step −
Starting from the first five-year plan, the government has kept on introducing various poverty reduction programs and policies.
Growth oriented approach was adopted with the assumption that all sectors would grow, and percolate into every level of society and help to remove poverty.
But even after such growth orientation, the condition has not improved, rather the gap between rich and poor has further widened.
The green revolution further worsened the condition by creating disparity between large and small scale farmers.
A special program — Food for Work aimed at eradication of poverty was launched in the 1970s.
Many other programs including self-employment programmes (listed below) were also launched around the same time −
Later in 1990s, the government changed the policy and started promoting Self-Help Groups (SHG). It primarily encourages people to save their own money and lend among themselves. At a later stage, government through banks will facilitate partial financial support.
Swarnajayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) is an example of SHG. SGSY has now been restructured as National Rural Livelihoods Mission (NRLM).
In the year 2005, the Parliament passed a new Act — Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act. This Act guaranteed wage employment to those rural households whose adult members volunteer to do unskilled manual work for a minimum of 100 days in a year.
During the period 2013-14, about five crore households got employment opportunities and benefitted from this act.
Further, three major programs have been launched to improve the nutritional status of the poor −
Some other programs launched for the better of the people in rural areas are −
Though a number of poverty reduction programs have been launched by the government the outcome has not been satisfactory enough. There are many areas, which are facing segregation and are being deprived of basic development. The reasons for the underperformance of these programs are −
This calls for participation of people from every stratum of the society. This will further facilitate inclusive growth and successful poverty eradication. For this, we need to encourage and educate people to participate from the grass root level.
The following table illustrates the poverty ratio −
Poverty Ratio | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | Rural | Urban | Total |
1993-93 | 50.1 | 31.8 | 44.3 |
2004-05 | 41.8 | 25.7 | 37.2 |
2011-12 | 25.7 | 13.7 | 21.9 |